Case Study On Justice, Certainty, And Legal Utility Related To Medical Malpractice Based On Decision Number 133 Pk/Pid/2012 And Its Relevance In Maqashid Syariah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64317/alqadha.v1i2.12Keywords:
Malpractice, Certainty of Justice and Legal Ulitily, Hifz al-NafsAbstract
Malpractice refers to acts of negligence committed by a doctor or medical personnel that can result in disability or even death in the patient which should prioritize the patient's safety. Based on this, the Supreme Court's decision was based on Decision Number 133 PK/Pid/2012 concerning the crime of medical malpractice. This study aims to analyze the basis of judges' considerations in medical malpractice cases based on Decision Number 113 PK/Pid/2012 and to analyze the principles of justice, certainty, and usefulness arising from the Supreme Court's decision in the case. In addition to the suitability of the case in terms of the objectives of Sharia law (Maqashid Syariah). This research approach uses a normative juridical approach and a case approach. Based on the results of the investigation, the judge's decision was based on Article 360 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 361 of the Criminal Code, Law Number 48 of 2009, Law No. 8 of 1981, and Law No. 14 of 1985 as amended by Law No. 5 of 2004 and the second amendment to Law No. 3 of 2009, as well as other laws and regulations. Based on the Defendant's actions, which have been proven to constitute medical negligence due to negligence, and considering that at the (PK) level he continued to strengthen his cassation appeal, the Defendant remains guilty under Article 360 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 361 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. One form of improving the quality of judicial decisions and the professionalism of judicial institutions is when judges are able to issue decisions that consider the three aspects of justice, certainty, and legal utility. Meanwhile, the relevance of this case is in line with Islamic principles that connect ethics and law, with a focus on the protection of life and moral responsibility.
References
Adi Wiraditya, G. G. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Malpraktik Kedokteran Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia. Kertha Desa, 9(1), 55–68.
Afif Mahfud, Muh. (2024). Buku Ajar Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Yoga Pratama. https://eprints2.undip.ac.id/id/eprint/23515/1/Binder%20Buku%20Ajar%20-%20Pengantar%20Ilmu%20Hukum%20dr%20afif.pdf
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Sektariat Jendral dan Kepanitaan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Astuti, B., & Rusdi Daud, M. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Pengaturan Transportasi Online. Al-Qisth Law Review, 6(2), 205–244. https://doi.org.10.2483/alqisth.6.2.205-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/al-qisth.6.2.205-244
Christha Auli, R. (2024). Pasal 359 KUHP tentang Kelalaian yang Menyebabkan Kematian. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/pasal-359-kuhp-tentang-kelalaian-yang-menyebabkan-kematian-lt660a880959938/
Doloksaribu, I., Hasnati, H., & Triana, Y. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Akibat Dari Malpraktik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Tenaga Medis. Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 12256–12267. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/1861
Dwi Rizkia, N., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris) (Vol. 1). Widina Media Utama.
Efendi, J. (2018). Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Berbasis Nilai-nilai Hukum dan Rasa Keadilan yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat (Vol. 1). Prenamedia Group.
Fadhlan, F., Akhyar, A., & Affan, I. (2023). Tindakan Malpraktek Dokter Sebagai Akibat Kelalaian Dokter Dalam Menangani Pasien Ditijau Dari Perspektif Hukum Kesehatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata, 5(1), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v5i1.326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v5i1.326
Fahmi, Z., Fariza, S. A., & Agustina Mtd, N. W. (2025). Negligence in the Medical Profession: A Comparative Study of Islamic Law and Indonesian Law. Yayasan Bantuan Hukum Nayottama Reswara, 1(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.63306/kqy31157.
Fahmiron, F. (2016). Independensi dan Akuntabilitas Hakim dalam Penegakan Hukum Sebagai Wujud Independensi dan Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Litigasi, 17(2), 3467–3516. http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v17i2.158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v17i2.158
Gede Atmaja, I. D. (2018). Teori-Teori Hukum (Vol. 1). Setara Press.
Gurusi, L., Mansyah, M. S., Lee, K., Purnamasari, Y., & Alfajar, S. (2024). Islamic Legal Perspective on Data of Child Victims of Sexual Violence: A Case Study of the Indonesia’s Court. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 16(2), 456–479. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v16i2.28358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v16i2.28358
Handoko, D. (2018). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (1st ed.). Hawa dan Ahwa.
Handoyo, B. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Malpraktik Dokter pada Pelayanan Kesehatan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. AT-TASYRI’: Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Muamalah, 12(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.47498/tasyri.v12i01.360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47498/tasyri.v12i01.360
Harmono, H., & Rasji, R. (2024). Problematika Pertimbangan Hukum Oleh Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan di Masyarakat. Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(10), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v5i10.939
Ichsan, M., Susila, M. E., & Gunawan, Y. (2017). Medical Malpractice In The Perspective of Islamic Law. 108. https://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/33296?show=full
Iman Santosa, P. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PT Alumni.
Iskandar Syah, M. (2019). Tuntutan Hukum Malpraktek Medis. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Jenderal MPR RI, S. (2020). Undang-undang Dasar 1945. Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI.
Jiverson Tumiwa, B. (2016). Kajian Yuridis Malpraktik Kedokteran Yang Mengakibatkan Meninggalnya Pasien Menurut Pasal 359 KUHP. Lex Privatum, 4(7), 132–139. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/13255
L. Diab, A. (2017). Maqashid Kesehatan & Etika Medis dalam Islam (Sintesis Fikih dan Kedokteran) (1st ed.). Deepublish.
Mahmud Marzuki, P. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
Mahmud Marzuki, P. (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (10th ed.). Kencana.
Majid, A. A., & Ali, L. O. B. (2025). Gender-Sensitive Policing: An Evaluation of National Legal Frameworks and Criminal Law Regarding Women in Conflict with the Law. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.64317/alqadha.v1i1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64317/alqadha.v1i1.3
Manan, A. (2006). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mappong, A. K. (2011). Tentang Peninjauan Kembali. Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Militer dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. https://ditjenmiltun.mahkamahagung.go.id/arsip/images/DOKUMEN/tentang%20peninjauan%20kembali%20makalah%20wakil%20ketua%20yudisial.pdf
Margono, M. (2019). Asas Keadilan Kemanfataan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim. Sinar Grafika.
Markus Larumpa, R. (2023). Melihat Hukum dalam Kenyataan (Suatu Analisis Teori-teori Hukum). Guepedia.
Mohamed Muhsin, S. (2023). Islamic Jurisprudence on Harm Versus Harm Scenarios in Medical Confidentiality. National Library of Medicine, 36(2), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-022-09503-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-022-09503-w
Montesquieu, B. de, & Nugent, T. (1899). The Spirit of Laws (Vol. 2). The Colonial Press.
Muh Sutri Mansyah, Hadi Supriyanto, Kaswandi, Erick Bason, & Sulayman. (2024). The Judge’s Paradigm In Deciding Criminal Cases Of Sexual Violence From A Victimological Perspective. Buana Gender: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak, 9(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.22515/bg.v9i1.8666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/bg.v9i1.8666
Muhaimin, M. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum (1st ed.). Mataram University Press.
Mustafa, G., & Darmawan, E. S. (2025). Strengthening Legal Frameworks and Patient Safety: A Narrative Review of Medical and Dental Malpractice in Indonesia. Jurnal ARSI : Administrasi Rumah Sakit Indonesia, 11(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.7454/arsi.v11i1.1185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/arsi.v11i1.1185
Nadriana, L. (2015). Pembuktian Kasus Malpraktek di Indonesia. Lex Publica, 2(1), 254–239. https://journal.appthi.org/index.php/lexpublica/article/view/28
Padela, A. (2022). Maqāṣidī Models for an “Islamic” Medical Ethics Problem-Solving or Confusing at the Bedside? American Journal of Islam and Society, 39(1–2), 72–114. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v39i1-2.3069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v39i1-2.3069
Paruntu, S. S., Pangaribuan, P., & Nadzir, M. (2024). Tindak Pidana Kelalaian Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian Berdasarkan Pasal 359 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. De Facto, 11(1), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.36277/jurnaldefacto.v11i1.229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36277/jurnaldefacto.v11i1.229
Pontoh, M. R. (2013). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Resiko Medik Dan Malpraktek Dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Dokter. Lex Crimen, 2(7), 74–83. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/3162/2704
Purwadianto, A., Soetedjo, S., Gunawan, S., Budiningsih, Y., Prawiroharjo, P., & Firmansyah, A. (2012). Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia. Pengurus Besar Ikatan Dokter Indonesia. https://equalsid.or.id/dokumen/101124182354_KODEKI-Tahun-2012.pdf%20%C2%B7%20versi%201.pdf
Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI, Putusan Nomor 112 PK/Pid/2012. (2012). Direktori Putusan.
Rahmayanti, R., Fibrini, D., Pangaribuan, D. R., Hasibuan, S. A., & Meutia, C. Y. (2024). Malpractice and Risk Of Medical Procedures. International Journal Reglement & Society, 5(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v5i2.532
Sadri, F., Juanda, J., & Atmoko, D. (2023). Konstruksi Yuridis Terhadap Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 46 Pid.Sus 2021 Pn.Srg Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 2(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v2i2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v2i2.284
Sahatiah, S. (2025). Protection or Punishment? Assessing Gender-Sensitive Policing and Legal Frameworks for Women in the Criminal Justice System. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 1(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.64317/alqadha.v1i1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64317/alqadha.v1i1.6
Salim, F. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Normatif Atas Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien Sebagai Konsumen Dalam Malpraktek Di Rumah Sakit. LEX Renaissance, 5(2), 390–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss2.art9
Soekanto, S. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. RajaGrafindo.
Sudihar, A., & Harijanti, S. D. (2024). Memotret Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Dari Berbagai Perspektif (1st ed., pp. 25–48). Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. https://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/storage/assets/uploads/files/aGKnO6sj_Bunga%20Rampai%20isi%20All%20small.pdf
Suyanto, S. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris dan Gabungan. Unigres Press.
Tifani Maulidyanti, A., Hayuningsih, S., & Rosmawati, B. (2024). Buku Ajar Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan (1st ed.). PT Nusa Fajar Cemerlang. https://repository.nuansafajarcemerlang.com/media/publications/587087-buku-ajar-etika-dan-hukum-kesehatan-69ed7d7a.pdf
U Puluhulawa, Moh. R. (2013). Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman terhadap Penegakan Hukum. Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Press. https://repository.ung.ac.id/karyailmiah/show/879/kemandirian-kekuasaan-kehakiman-terhadap-penegakan-hukum.html
Ulya, M., & Nurliana, N. (2025). Perspektif Qur’anic Perspectives on Digital Health Ethics and Artificial Intelligence. Program Studi DIII Rekam Medis Dan Informasi Kesehatan, 5(1), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.62951/icistech.v5i1.275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62951/icistech.v5i1.275
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (LN. 1981/ No.76, TLN. No.3209, LL SETNEG : 68 HLM). (1981). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/47041/uu-no-8-tahun-1981
Vatar Simanjuntak, S. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Oleh Dokter Yang Melakukan Tindak Malpraktek. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta. https://repository.uajy.ac.id/id/eprint/8168
Widi Astuti, D. (2009). Kedudukan Hukum Rekam Medis dan Informed Consent Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Kasus Malpraktek [Thesis, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/8694/diah%20widi%20astuti%20fix.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Wijayanto, D. (2018). Meluruskan Arah Manajemen Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Vol. 1). Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Yuhanah, S., Muhajirin, M., & Al-Wahhab KH, H. A. (2024). Analisis Implementasi Maqashid Syariah pada Rumah Sakit Berkompetensi Syariah di Indonesia Sebagai Unique Value Preposition. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 6(4), 1817–1826. https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v6i4.1106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v6i4.1106
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fathor Razi, Azmi Mubarok (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
